Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Miller v. Anderson et al
as 5:2020cv01743
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Miller
Defendant:
Christopher D. Pappas, Charles E. Jones, Donald T. Misheff and others
Intervenor:
Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W., Local 103, Electrical Workers Pension Fund, I.B.E.W., Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis and others
Petitioner:
Massachusetts Laborer Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
The Police Retirement System of St. Louis v. Barra et al
as 2:2014cv11624
Plaintiff:
The Police Retirement System of St. Louis
Defendant:
Mary T. Barra , Theodore M. Solso , Stephen J. Girsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Frontier Financial, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02969
Defendant:
Frontier Financial, Inc. and St. Louis Title, LLC
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Two Men and a Truck/International, Inc. v. Cutlip et al
as 1:2012cv00034
Plaintiff:
Two Men and a Truck/International, Inc.
Defendant:
Brent Cutlip , Local Mooving Company, The and St. Louis Orlando Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crosset Company, LLC v. St. Louis I.G.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv12130
Plaintiff:
Crosset Company, LLC
Defendant:
St. Louis I.G.A., Inc. and Kenneth R Zoppa
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. v. St. Louis Gynecology & Oncology, LLC et al
as 5:2009cv02613
Plaintiff:
Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc., Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. and Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc.
Defendant:
St. Louis Gynecology & Oncology, LLC and Kirk A. Bowman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Baker's Bridge, LLC v. Golf Discount of St. Louis, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00360
Plaintiff:
Baker's Bridge, LLC
Defendant:
Golf Discount of St. Louis, Inc. and Ned B. Story
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
