Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Necaise v. Bay St. Louis-Waveland School District
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Amy Necaise
Defendant:
Bay St. Louis-Waveland School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dedeaux v. City of Bay St. Louis et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Abel J. Dedeaux
Defendant:
City of Bay St. Louis, J. Toby Schwartz, Ricky Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Dedeaux v. Hancock County et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Abel J. Dedeaux
Defendant:
Hancock County, City of Bay St. Louis, MS, Anthony Gambino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Thomas v. City of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Oscar Thomas
Defendant:
Bay St. Louis Police Department, Rachel Jewell, Steven Lee Saucier and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. United States et al
as 4:2021cv00173
Plaintiff:
Arizona Hall, Jr.
Defendant:
United States, John Does, Phil Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
920 South Beach Blvd., LLC v. City of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi et al
as 1:2021cv00263
Plaintiff:
920 South Beach Blvd., LLC
Defendant:
The City of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi, SWK, LLC, James J. Chiniche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00155
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00312
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
