Cases 1 - 10 of 54
WATSON v. REESE et al
as 2:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
ERIC JASON WATSON
Defendant:
DEPUTY CODY REESE and PROBATION OFFICER KEN STAHL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berger et al v. Springs Window Fashions et al
as 4:2023cv01557
Plaintiff:
Doreen Berger, Tessa Charles, Anitra Hampe and others
Defendant:
Springs Window Fashions and Springs Window Fashion Manufacturing Co, USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
STAHLE v. ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 3:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
SHANNON STAHLE
Defendant:
ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Folk v. United States Of America, et al
as 3:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Omar S. Folk
Defendant:
United States Of America, Et, Al, Dr. Elizabeth Stahl, Dr. Brian Buschman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stahl v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Stahl
Defendant:
SoClean Inc and SOCLEAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STAHL v. MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC
as 2:2021cv01905
Plaintiff:
VALERIE STAHL
Defendant:
MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Santos v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv01831
Plaintiff:
Rafael Santos
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Kevin Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. Snook et al
as 4:2021cv01333
Plaintiff:
Christopher P. White
Defendant:
Morgan Snook, Chris Benson, Ryan Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITFIELD v. KNOLL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02776
Defendant:
RON KASS, CHRISTOPHER G KENNEDY, ANDREW B COGAN and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Story v. Howard et al
as 3:2020cv01099
Defendant:
C. Howard, T. Cullen, S. Gosa and others
Plaintiff:
Arlando Story
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
