Cases 1 - 10 of 623
Matthew Perry v. Warden Lieber Corr Inst
as 11-7375
Petitioner - Appellant:
MATTHEW DUSTIN PERRY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
STAN BURTT
John Baccus v. Stan Burtt
as 11-7101
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS
Respondent - Appellee:
STAN BURTT, Warden and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General
Perry v. Burtt
as 2:2010cv02436
Petitioner:
Matthew Dustin Perry
Respondent:
Stan Burtt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Campbell v. Burtt
as 0:2010cv00671
Petitioner:
Robert Campbell
Respondent:
Stan Burtt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peoples v. King et al
as 1:2010cv00106
Plaintiff:
Robert Peoples
Defendant:
Daryl King , Samuel Johnson , Sandra Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peoples v. King et al
as 8:2010cv00106
Plaintiff:
Robert Peoples
Defendant:
Daryl King, Samuel Johnson, Sandra Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
William Allen, Sr. v. Lisa Carrington
as 09-7885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM DALE ALLEN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA CARRINGTON, in her individual capacity, VERA JENKINS, in her individual capacity, STAN BURTT, in his individual capacity and others
Abdiyyah Alkebulanyahh v. Jon Ozmint
as 09-7462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDIYYAH BEN ALKEBULANYAHH, a/k/a Tyree Alphonso Roberts
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT and STAN BURTT, Warden
Defendant - None:
GEORGE W. BUSH and MARK SANFORD, Governor
Jerome Cochrane v. Stan Burtt
as 09-7227
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEROME COCHRANE
Respondent - Appellee:
STAN BURTT, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Hillie v. Burtt et al
as 0:2009cv01422
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hillie
Defendant:
Stan Burtt, McKeither Bodison, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
