Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Edward Craig, II v. Bob Gualtieri, et al
as 23-13491
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD CECIL CRAIG, II
Defendant / Appellee:
BOB GUALTIERI, STANFIELD, DEPUTY CAMINERO and others
Anthony Oliver v. Warden Wilcox State Prison, et al
as 23-11968
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY OLIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN WILCOX STATE PRISON, DEESE, SEAN WEAVER and others
Craig v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2021cv02117
Plaintiff:
Edward Cecil Craig, II
Defendant:
Bob Gualtieri, Stanfield, Caminero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2021cv01496
Defendant:
Sgt. Clark, Dep. Kiwan, Sgt. Hess and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Cecil Craig, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. WHITTINGTON et al
as 5:2021cv00183
Defendant:
WARDEN WHITTINGTON, OFFICER TURNER, OFFICER DEESE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanfield v. Thomas et al
as 1:2017cv01825
Petitioner:
Edgar Lee Stanfield
Respondent:
Willie Thomas and Alabama Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stanfield v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00907
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Stanfield
Defendant:
Dr. Darbouze, Corrections Medical Services and Dr. Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanfield v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 2)(CONSENT)
as 2:2013cv00452
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Stanfield
Defendant:
Dr. Darbouze and Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanfield v. Curry et al
as 2:2007cv00685
Petitioner:
Edgar Lee Stanfield
Respondent:
Chris Curry, Hub Harrington, Robby Owen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanfield v. Shelby County Circuit Court et al
as 2:2007cv00667
Petitioner:
Edgar Lee Stanfield
Respondent:
Shelby County Circuit Court, Harrington, Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
