Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Young at Heart LLC v. Marshall
as 2:2023cv00652
Plaintiff:
Young at Heart LLC
Defendant:
Andrew Stanford Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lameman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv08074
Plaintiff:
Stanford Lameman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stanford v. Plump et al
as 2:2021cv02123
Plaintiff:
Mark D Stanford
Defendant:
Stevan Plump, Unknown Plump and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00791
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Wiggs v. Historic Palace Saloon and Restaurant LLC et al
as 3:2020cv08287
Defendant:
Historic Palace Saloon and Restaurant LLC, Martha MeKeel, Scott Stanford and others
Plaintiff:
Grant Wiggs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Young v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03311
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Stanford Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04217
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Matthews v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04502
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Stanford Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopshire v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 4:2018cv00333
Defendant:
Pima County Board of Administrator, Lisa Green, James Marner and others
Plaintiff:
Caraleen Marie Lopshire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Stanford et al
as 2:2017cv03394
Plaintiff:
Owen Arvie Thompson
Defendant:
Amanda Stanford and Kyrene Felix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
