Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Smith v. Hogan et al
as 2:2024cv02620
Plaintiff:
Gerald K Smith
Defendant:
D. Hogan, Warden Norman Robinson, Stanley Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. Mohr et al
as 2:2020cv04141
Plaintiff:
Carlos Richardson
Defendant:
Steven Gause, Gary Mohr, Jeffery Noble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr, Sr. v. Noble et al
as 2:2013cv00762
Plaintiff:
James M. Carr, Sr.
Defendant:
Jeff Noble, Decarlo M. Blackwell, Steve Cahill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 2:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
James Mobley
Defendant:
State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Gary C Mohr, Gary R. Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mobley v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction et al
as 2:2011cv00326
Plaintiff:
James Mobley
Defendant:
State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Warden Madison Correctional Institution, Deputy Warden Madison Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daugherty v. Timmerman-Cooper et al
as 2:2010cv01069
Plaintiff:
Michael Daugherty
Defendant:
Deborah Timmerman-Cooper, Ernie Moore, Curtis Wingard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Parrish et al
as 2:2010cv00352
Plaintiff:
Frank C Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Russ Parrish, Deb Timmerman-Cooper, Stanley Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Berry et al
as 2:2009cv00997
Plaintiff:
Antoine S Lee
Defendant:
Ken Berry, Maurice Wymberly, Pyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Taylor et al
as 2:2008cv01114
Plaintiff:
Robert Gibson and Robert Gibson
Defendant:
Stanley Taylor, John Doe and Deb Timmerman-Cooper
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
