Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Nayman v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv05816
Defendant:
Paula Boggs, Esq., Christopher C. Paci, Esq. and Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Irwin Nayman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Arogant Hollywood, et al v. Starbucks Corporation, et al
as 17-56283
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AROGANT HOLLYWOOD and ALISON HELEN FAIRCHILD
Defendant - Appellee:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington state corporation, ANNE SLOANE, TAYLOR OBERLANDER and others
Ali v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2015cv01450
Plaintiff:
Hussein Ali
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John Westley v. Henry Bryant, et al
as 15-2713
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Westley
Defendant - Appellee:
Henry L. Bryant, Minnesota Attorney General's Office, Florida Attorney General Office and others
Daniel Bitton v. Burger King, et al
as 15-13305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL BITTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BURGER KING, STARBUCKS CORPORATION, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Mitchell v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2015cv05316
Plaintiff:
Sarece Mitchell
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Derrick Johnson v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02871
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Wesley Ikeda, Wesley Ikeda and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Johnson
Westley v. Bryant et al
as 0:2014cv05002
Plaintiff:
John Westley
Defendant:
Henry L. Bryant, Minnesota Attorney General Office, Florida Attorney General Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levy v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2013cv02021
Plaintiff:
Amanda U. Levy
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
De La Rosa et al v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2013cv01038
Plaintiff:
Dedra De La Rosa
Defendant:
Riverview East Owners, Inc., Bradley LLC., Walgreen Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
