Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
John Stancu v. Starwood Hotels and Resorts, et al
as 16-10513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN STANCU
Defendant - Appellee:
STARWOOD HOTELS AND RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INCORPORATED and SHERATON HOTEL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-11285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
D'Aquin et al v. Starwood Hotels and Worldwide Properties Inc et al
as 2:2015cv01963
Plaintiff:
Thomas D'Aquin and Esther Kelly
Defendant:
Patrick Jordan , Don Norwood , Colleen Ewert and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Thomas L D'Aquin
Consol_defendant:
Touro Infirmary, OANO and Dr. Lurie
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Stancu v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00672
Plaintiff:
John Stancu
Defendant:
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc and Sheraton Hotel
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00150
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03469
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00402
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
512) 597-3172 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
