Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,447
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE et al v. WOMACK CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION
as 1:2024cv00837
Plaintiff: MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS
Defendant: WOMACK CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE et al v. SCHILLI PLASTERING COMPANY
as 1:2024cv00830
Plaintiff: MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSIONFUNDS,
Defendant: SCHILLI PLASTERING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST ) AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND et al v. Harris
as 1:2024cv03955
Plaintiff: CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST ) AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND and Charles A. Whobrey
Defendant: Nezsba Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Central States Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Contreras et al
as 3:2024cv01149
Plaintiff: Central States Health & Welfare Fund and Charles A Whobrey
Defendant: Mercedes Contreras, Samantha Sanford and Norma Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the North Atlantic States Carpenters Health, Pension, Annuity, Apprenticeship, and Labor Management Cooperation Funds v. Dame Contracting, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03454
Respondent: Dame Contracting, Inc. and Dame Contracting
Petitioner: Trustees of the North Atlantic States Carpenters Health, Pension, Annuity, Apprenticeship, and Labor Management Cooperation Funds
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE et al v. DYKSTRA CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, CO.
as 1:2024cv00796
Plaintiff: MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS
Defendant: DYKSTRA CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Board of Trustees, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union NO. 74 Pension Fund et al v. Carrier Building Services
as 1:2024cv00570
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union NO. 74 Pension Fund, Board of Trustees, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union NO. 74 Annuity Fund, Board of Trustees, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union NO. 74 Welfare Fund and others
Defendant: Carrier Building Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 1249 Pension Fund et al v. Highliners Barnecue Enterprises Corp et al
as 5:2024cv00637
Plaintiff: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 1249 Pension Fund, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 1249 Annuity Fund, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 1249 Insurance Fund and others
Defendant: Highliners Barnecue Enterprises Corp doing business as Hotwire Line Construction and Randy E. Dearing Individually and as an Officer of Highliners Barbecue Enterprises Corp doing business as Hotwire Line Construction
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Board of Trustees, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Pension Fund et al v. Summit Mechanical, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00558
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Pension Fund, Board of Trustees, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Annuity Fund, Board of trustess, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Welfare Fund and others
Defendant: Summit Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the North Atlantic States Carpenters Health, Pension, Annuity, Apprenticeship, and Labor Management Cooperation Funds v. TAAS Contracting LLC
as 2:2024cv03276
Petitioner: Trustees of the North Atlantic States Carpenters Health, Pension, Annuity, Apprenticeship, and Labor Management Cooperation Funds
Respondent: TAAS Contracting LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?