Cases 31 - 40 of 94,642
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
BLACKSTONE v. PLATKIN et al
as 3:2024cv06127
Petitioner:
CLEVESTER BLACKSTONE
Respondent:
MATTHEW J. PLATKIN, N.J. STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, N.J. STATE GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Indiana State of v. Express Scripts Administrators et al
as 2:2024cv06068
Plaintiff:
Indiana State of
Defendant:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS ADMINISTRATORS LLC. doing business as EXPRESS SCRIPTS, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C., NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES CARPENTERS FUNDS et al v. MCFAUL MILLWORK SOLUTIONS INC.
as 1:2024cv06078
Petitioner:
EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES CARPENTERS FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF AND EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS AS SUCCESSORS TO KEYSTONE MOUNTAIN LAKES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Respondent:
MCFAUL MILLWORK SOLUTIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Tavani et al v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2024cv02032
Plaintiff:
Peter Tavani and Jennifer Tavani
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
COLLINS v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv02074
Petitioner:
RODNEY COLLINS
Respondent:
JOSEPH TERRA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2024cv00704
Petitioner:
JAMES KING
Respondent:
KENNETH R. HOLLIBAUGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Francis Battista
as 24-1876
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
FRANCIS J. BATTISTA, a/k/a FRANK BATTISTA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
