Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04950
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jones v. Law et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
William Rodney Jones
Defendant:
David Law, Scotty Frank Jones, Coosa County Probate Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tinch v. Clayton County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2016cv02781
Plaintiff:
Lisa Tinch
Defendant:
Clayton County Board of Commissioners, Jeffrey E. Turner, Eldrin Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Carew et al
as 1:2016cv21109
Plaintiff:
Hermon Tywon Williams
Defendant:
Edward Carew, Bank of America and State Farm Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridley v. Simmons et al
as 3:2011cv00081
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Ridley
Defendant:
State Farm Insurance Company, St. Vincent Hospital, Memorial Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridley v. Simmons et al
as 3:2011cv00080
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Ridley
Defendant:
Paul Simmons, Connice Simmons and State Farm Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ridley v. Simmons et al
as 2:2011cv00010
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Ridley
Defendant:
Paul Simmons, Connice Simmons and State Farm Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ridley v. Simmons et al
as 2:2011cv00009
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Ridley
Defendant:
Paul Simmons, Connice Simmons, State Farm Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. State Farm Insurance Company et al
as 1:2008cv00855
Plaintiff:
Dietrich A. Lee
Defendant:
State Farm Insurance Company, State Farm Insurance Company, Kathryn Fenbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Ridley v. State Farm Insurance Company et al
as 3:2007cv01038
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Ridley
Defendant:
State Farm Insurance Company, Paul Simmons and Connice Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
