Cases 1 - 10 of 4,506
Pittman v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv01937
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
Nicole Allen, Stockbridge Police Department and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01942
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Williams
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Georgia Department of Corrections and Phillips State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Brantley et al
as 1:2024cv01926
Plaintiff:
Kenroy-Kevon Powell
Defendant:
G. Grant Brantley, Amelia G. Pray, Division of Child Support Services State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Moultrie v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01922
Plaintiff:
Latoya Shanah Moultrie
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, City of Smyrna Police Department, Officer T. Cooper and others
Powell v. Georgia Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv01928
Plaintiff:
Kenroy Kevon Powell
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Human Services, Amelia G. Pray, G. Grant Brantley and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Pittman v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
The Mark Atlanta Georgia and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Brandon Morrall
as 24-11329
Petitioner:
In re: BRANDON MORRALL
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Pittman v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv01818
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
JORDAN A WATSON
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
In re: Herman Ingram
as 24-11288
Petitioner:
In re: HERMAN INGRAM
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
