Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 96
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant: STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court: XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor: THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Valles v. Attorney General of the United States, et al.
as 23-1674
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDREW VALLES
Defendant / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF UTAH
Andrew Valles v. United States Attorney General, et al
as 23-55445
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDREW VALLES
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF UTAH
Andrew Valles v. United States Attorney General, et al
as 23-55441
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDREW VALLES
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF UTAH
State of Washington, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-35294
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ROBERT M. CALIFF, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Petitioner / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF IOWA, STATE OF MONTANA and others
State of Washington et al v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03026
Plaintiff: State of Washington, State of Oregon, State of Arizona and others
Defendant: United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert M Califf, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: State of Idaho, State of Iowa, State of Montana and others
Amicus Curiae: Legal Voice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Save the Colorado, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 23-15247
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAVE THE COLORADO, LIVING RIVERS and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Aparna Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services, LLC, et al
as 22-56118
Plaintiff / Appellant: APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, CHRIS HOWELL, an individual, JUSTIN SPENCER, an individual and others
Andrew Valles v. Attorney General of the United States (S.D.N.Y) et al
as 2:2022cv06954
Petitioner: Andrew Valles
Respondent: Attorney General of the United States (S.D.N.Y), Attorney General of the State of California (S.D.Cal.) and Attorney General of the State of Utah (D.UT.)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valles v. Attorney Genereal of the United States et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01375
Plaintiff: Andrew Valles
Defendant: Attorney General of the United States, Attorney General of the State of California and Attorney General of the State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?