Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. The State of Virginia
as 2:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
Erick Anthony Santos
Respondent:
The State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Acheampong v. Commonwealth of the State of Virginia
as 7:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Kwaku Oti Acheampong
Defendant:
Commonwealth of the State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6214
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nelson v. Federal Tribunal et al
as 7:2022cv00719
Plaintiff:
Marquise Leon Nelson
Defendant:
Federal Tribunal, The United States of America, The State of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Singleton v. State of Virginia
as 1:2022cv01109
Petitioner:
Cornelius Singleton
Respondent:
State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams
as 22-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN JANE OR JOHN DOE, Director, IRS Department of the Treasury, WILLIAMS, Reck Officer, FCI Beckley, FORREN, Lieutenant, FCI Beckley and others
Dalton Dixon v. State of North Carolina
as 22-6695
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DALTON ALONZO DIXON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and STATE OF VIRGINIA
Dalton Dixon v. State of North Carolina
as 22-6626
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DALTON ALONZO DIXON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and STATE OF VIRGINIA
Miller v. State of Virginia's English Constru Co.
as 7:2021cv00574
Plaintiff:
Eric Evan Miller
Defendant:
State of Virginia's English Constru. Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
