Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Christian v. Commonwealth State of Virginia
as 3:2014cv00417
Plaintiff:
Patrick O. Christian
Defendant:
Commonwealth State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Christian v. Commonwealth State of Virginia
as 3:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Patrick O. Christian
Defendant:
Commonwealth State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kramer v. Virginia State Court System et al
as 6:2013cv00007
Defendant:
John Blades, Tammie Blades, City Of Lynchburg and others
Plaintiff:
Justin S. Kramer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Krzeminska v. The State of Virginia
as 1:2011cv00596
Plaintiff:
Olga M Krzeminska
Defendant:
The State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Torjman v. The State of Virginia
as 1:2011cv00560
Plaintiff:
Mireille Torjman
Defendant:
The State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. The State of Virginia
as 2:2010cv00575
Plaintiff:
Eric Emanuel Taylor
Defendant:
The State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rutledge v. Town of Chatham, Virginia et al
as 4:2010cv00035
Defendant:
Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard, Chatham, Va Police Department, Chief Marvin Wright of the Chatham, Va Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. State of Virginia, et al
as 3:2009cv00425
Plaintiff:
David Clinton Parker
Defendant:
State of Virginia - Dinwiddie Circuit Court and Thomas V. Warren
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1231 (a)(6) Due Process Clause
Hawkins v. State of Virginia and Experiment et al
as 1:2009cv00609
Plaintiff:
Joyce Ann Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Virginia and Experiment, Black Leaders, The State Witness Protection Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
