Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Lambert v. RELX PLC et al
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Marsha Gaye Lambert
Defendant:
RELX PLC, State of Virginia, State of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Acheampong v. Commonwealth of the State of Virginia
as 7:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Kwaku Oti Acheampong
Defendant:
Commonwealth of the State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Federal Tribunal et al
as 7:2022cv00719
Plaintiff:
Marquise Leon Nelson
Defendant:
Federal Tribunal, The United States of America, The State of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Miller v. State of Virginia's English Constru Co.
as 7:2021cv00574
Plaintiff:
Eric Evan Miller
Defendant:
State of Virginia's English Constru. Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. State of Virginia
as 7:2020cv00108
Petitioner:
Freddie Shawn Phillips
Respondent:
State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. State of Virginia
as 7:2018cv00585
Respondent:
State of Virginia
Petitioner:
Marquise Leon Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abdul-Sabur v. State of Virginia
as 7:2018cv00367
Respondent:
State of Virginia
Petitioner:
Wakeel Abdul-Sabur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kramer v. Virginia State Court System et al
as 6:2013cv00007
Defendant:
John Blades, Tammie Blades, City Of Lynchburg and others
Plaintiff:
Justin S. Kramer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knight v. State of Virginia et al
as 7:2012cv00338
Respondent:
Harold W. Clark and State of Virginia
Petitioner:
Rayfel Andre Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Dowdy et al
as 7:2011cv00570
Plaintiff:
James F. Clark
Defendant:
Norman Dowdy, K. Mike Fleenor, Jr., The State of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
