Cases 21 - 30 of 246
Aaron v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
as 5:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lamar Aaron
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burress v. Dade County, Georgia et al
as 4:2021cv00249
Plaintiff:
Kevin Owen Burress
Defendant:
Dade County, Georgia, State of Georgia, DeKalb County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00828
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lamar Aaron
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greer-El v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00725
Plaintiff:
Jerome Greer-El
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Jefferson S. Dunn, COI Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Alabama
as 1:2021cv00467
Petitioner:
Willie Kevin Williams
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3600
Robinson v. Dean et al
as 5:2021cv01148
Plaintiff:
Michael Richard Tion Robinson
Defendant:
J. Blake Dean, Madison Morgan Stac Team, Huntsville Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Turner et al
as 5:2021cv00920
Plaintiff:
Charles Patrick Wayne Burgess
Defendant:
Wells Turner, Martha Williams, Jeff Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Hayes et al
as 7:2021cv00869
Defendant:
State of Alabama, The, Jason Hayes and Pickens County Jail
Plaintiff:
Dealio Deshone Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00379
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Patrice Richie Jones, Steven T. Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddis v. Bar Association, The
as 1:2021cv00587
Defendant:
Bar Association, The, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Jimmy Kilgore
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
