Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Fifth Third Bank, National Association v. Boston Market Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv03030
Plaintiff:
Fifth Third Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Boston Market Corporation, US Foods, Inc., Greenridge Plaza 674, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Djedi Order v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
DJEDI ORDER and Heru Spencer
Defendant:
State of Montana, State Of Florida, State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
A.M. v. Indianapolis Public Schools, et al
as 22-2332
Plaintiff / Appellee:
A. M., by her mother and next friend, E.M.
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS and SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS, in her official capacity
Intervenor:
STATE OF INDIANA
Amicus Curiae:
INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S LAW CENTER, RILEY GAINES, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
STATE OF INDIANA et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA, THE STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Whole Woman's Health Alliance, et al v. Theodore Rokita, et al
as 21-2573
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE, ALL-OPTIONS, INC. and JEFFREY GLAZER, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant:
THEODORE E. ROKITA, Attorney General of the State of Indiana, in his official capacity, KRISTINA BOX, Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health, in her official capacity, JOHN STROBEL, M.D., President of the Indiana Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Cook County, Illinois, et al v. State of Texas, et al
as 21-2561
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS
Appellant:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID P. PEKOSKE, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Whole Woman's Health Alliance, et al v. Todd Rokita, et al
as 21-2480
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE, ALL-OPTIONS, INC. and JEFFREY GLAZER, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant:
THEODORE E. ROKITA, Attorney General of the State of Indiana, in his official capacity, KRISTINA BOX, Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health, in her official capacity, JOHN STROBEL, M.D., President of the Indiana Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Common Cause Indiana v. Indiana State Conference of th, et al
as 20-2911
Defendant / Appellant:
S. ANTHONY LONG, in their official capacities as members of the Indiana Election Commission, CONNIE LAWSON, in her official capacity as Indiana Secretary of State, SUZANNAH WILSON OVERHOLT, in their official capacities as members of the Indiana Election Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIANA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE and COMMON CAUSE INDIANA
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF GEORGIA, ELECTION LAW SCHOLARS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Connell v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2019cv00728
Defendant:
State of Maryland, State of Arizona, State of Delaware and others
Plaintiff:
Rev James E Connell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Indiana et al v. Medical Informatics Engineering Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00969
Plaintiff:
State of Arkansas, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant:
NoMoreClipboard, LLC, Medical Informatics Engineering Inc and Medical Informatics Engineering Inc doing business as Enterprise Health LLC doing business as K&L Holdings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1320 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
