Cases 1 - 10 of 20,348
Codner v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 0:2024cv60726
Plaintiff:
Elijah Shane Codner
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, Governor Ron DeSantis, Attorney General Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
STATE OF FLORIDA v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES et al
as 8:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, STEVEN DETTELBACH, THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Marchan v. State of Florida
as 4:2024cv00613
Petitioner:
Ephrain Jr. Mark Marchan
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. State of Florida
as 9:2024cv80554
Plaintiff:
Johnny Thomas
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Mills v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11332
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ROGER MILLS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
KENON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
CARLOS S KENON
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MacDonald v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jason MacDonald
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARNEY vs STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Carlton Daley
as 24-11330
Petitioner:
In re: CARLTON O. DALEY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
In re: Richard Warren
as 24-11340
Petitioner:
In re: RICHARD L. WARREN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
