Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Edwards v. Sangamon County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Aaron Edwards
Defendant:
Sangamon County Sheriffs Office, Extended Stay of America, Government Official Capacity and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scales v. State of Ill et al
as 1:2020cv00131
Plaintiff:
Maurice J Scales
Defendant:
State of Ill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caudle v. State of ILL. et al
as 3:2018cv50230
Plaintiff:
Stacey A. Caudle
Defendant:
Dekalb County Stat Attorney's Office, State of ILL., Nancy Radke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Choice v. State of ILL
as 1:2017cv09140
Plaintiff:
Calvin Choice
Defendant:
State of ILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Burch et al
as 1:2016cv08866
Plaintiff:
Wade Montgomery
Defendant:
Athony Burch, Becky Williams, State of Ill. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peevy v. People of State of ILL et al
as 1:2015cv04431
Plaintiff:
James Peevy
Defendant:
People of State of ILL, Department of Correctional, Director Office of John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. County of Cook Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2014cv04969
Plaintiff:
Victor Patterson
Defendant:
County of Cook Cook County, IL, Cook Court Sheriff Dept., Tom Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Garcia et al
as 1:2012cv06347
Plaintiff:
Ruben Sanchez
Defendant:
State of ILL., Cook County, City Of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Tabor v. City of Elgin P.D. et al
as 1:2009cv06414
Plaintiff:
John B Tabor
Defendant:
City of Elgin P.D., Kane County Court, State of ILL. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
