Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ZAHIR v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 2:2021cv00457
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, ANNE COLT LEITESS, CHRISTOPHER HOOPER and others
Plaintiff:
NAJA TALIBAH ZAHIR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZAHIR v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 2:2021cv00456
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, AISHA N. BRAVEBOY and ANTOINETTE WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
NAJA TALIBAH ZAHIR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZAHIR v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 2:2021cv00454
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, AISHA N. BRAVEBOY, HURMAYONNE W. MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
NAJA TALIBAH ZAHIR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCKSHAW v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2020cv05962
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION and GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOMES v. ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOT, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05952
Defendant:
PARK PALAIS LLC, ANN CLARY GORDON, ESQ., SHAPIRO SHER and others
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH COOMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIZVI v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 3:2019cv00079
Defendant:
BUNDESAMT FUR JUSTIZ, SWITZERLAND (BfD), DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, STATE OF MARYLAND, KINDES-UND ERWACHSENENSCHUTSBEHORDE ST. GALLEN, SWITZERLAND ("KESB") and others
Plaintiff:
M.D. HIL RIZVI and DR. HIL RIZVI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rizvi, M.D. v. Department Of Social Services, State of Maryland et al
as 4:2019cv00872
Plaintiff:
Dr. Hil Rizvi, M.D.
Defendant:
Bundesamt fur Justiz, Switzerland (BfD), Department of Children and Families, State of Masssachusetts, Department Of Social Services, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis et al v. Martin et al
as 1:2015cv00508
Plaintiff:
David Davis and Maribeth Donohue
Defendant:
Randall Martin , Theresa Martin , Lifeline, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
