Cases 1 - 7 of 7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04055
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant:
APPLE, INC. and APPLE INC.
Petitioner:
PHV NICOLE DEMERS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
State of Minnesota v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01946
Petitioner:
Minnesota Department of Human Services
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Defendant:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C., NOVO NORDISK INC. and ELI LILLY AND CO.
Special Master:
HON. DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH, RET.
SILBERSHER et al v. JANNSEN BIOTECH INC. et al
as 2:2019cv12107
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN ONCOLOGY, INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
STATE OF MINNESOTA, BY ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL LORI SWANSON v. SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC et al
as 3:2018cv14999
Defendant:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, ELI LILLY AND CO. and NOVO NORDISK, INC.
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MINNESOTA, BY ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL LORI SWANSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
BLASKOWSKI v. STATE OF MINNESOTA et al
as 1:2016cv01979
Plaintiff:
ADAM F BLASKOWSKI
Defendant:
STATE OF MINNESOTA, VICKI LANDWEMR, JOHN SCHERER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America et al v. Bristol Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv01039
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Illinois , Elisa Dickson and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , Sanofi US Service Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. OMNICARE, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01326
Plaintiff:
THE STATE OF INDIANA, THE STATE OF GEORGIA, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Defendant:
PHARMERICA CORPORATION, NCS HEALTHCARE, INC., NEIGHBORCARE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
