Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kristin Worth, et al v. Bob Jacobson
as 23-2248
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Kristin Worth, Austin Dye, Axel Anderson and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Bob Jacobson, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Defendant:
Kyle Burton, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Mille Lacs County, Minnesota, Dan Starry, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Washington County, Minnesota and Troy Wolbersen, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Douglas County, Minnesota
Appellant:
Everytown for Gun Safety, formerly known as Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund, United States, State of Illinois and others
James Carson, et al v. Steve Simon, et al
as 20-3139
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Robert LaRose, Gary Severson, Teresa Maples and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eric Lucero and James Carson
Defendant / Appellee:
Steve Simon, Secretary of State of the State of Minnesota, in his official capacity
Not Yet Classified:
State of Nevada, District of Columbia, State of New Mexico and others
United States of America et al v. EV3 Endovascular, Inc.
as 0:2019cv02560
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Covidien PLC, Tyco Healthcare Group LP and EV3 Endovascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Engel v. State of Alaska et al
as 3:2017cv05086
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
State of Alaska, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Ian Pollard, et al v. Lewis M. Frost, et al
as 17-1818
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ian Pollard
Defendant - Appellee:
Remington Arms Company, LLC, Sporting Goods Properties, Inc. and E.I. Du Pont Nemours and Company
Objector:
Terry Pennington and Rodney Townsend
Objector - Appellant:
Lewis M. Frost and Richard Denney
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant(s):
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellee(s):
State of Alabama, State of Arkansas, State of Louisiana and others
Ambrosecchia v. Alaven Pharmaceutical, LLC et al
as 4:2012cv02164
Plaintiff:
Shara Ambrosecchia , State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant:
Paddock Laboratories, LLC and Perrigo Company, Inc.
Movant:
United States of America and State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Gibson v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2012cv00558
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lawrence Gibson
Defendant:
State of Missouri, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donna Scroggin v. Wyeth
as 08-2711
:
In re: Prempro Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Donna Scroggin
Defendant - Appellant:
Wyeth, and its divisions
Defendant:
Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, L.L.C.
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc. and Duramed Pharmaceuticals
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellee:
State of Arkansas, State of Florida, State of Idaho and others
Appellee:
Arkansas Trial Lawyers Association
Donna Scroggin v. Pharmacia & Upjohn Co.
as 08-2713
:
In re: Prempro Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Donna Scroggin
Defendant:
Wyeth, and its divisions
Defendant - Appellant:
Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, L.L.C.
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc. and Duramed Pharmaceuticals
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellee:
State of Arkansas, State of Florida, State of Idaho and others
Appellee:
Arkansas Trial Lawyers Association
Donna Scroggin, et al v. Wyeth, et al
as 08-2555
:
In re: Prempro Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donna Scroggin
Defendant - Appellee:
Wyeth, and its divisions and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, L.L.C.
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellee:
Barr Laboratories, Inc. and Duramed Pharmaceuticals
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant:
State of Arkansas, State of Florida, State of Idaho and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
