Cases 21 - 30 of 915
Morris v. State of Oklahoma
as 23-6101
Petitioner / Appellant:
PRENTISS MORRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Bruner v. The State of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv00659
Petitioner:
Jamele R Bruner
Respondent:
The State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bolin v. Oklahoma, State of
as 4:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Bolin
Defendant:
Oklahoma, State of and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cannon v. State of Oklahoma, The
as 4:2023cv00293
Petitioner:
Jemaine Monteil Cannon
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Luginbyhl v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00279
Petitioner:
Levi McRae Luginbyhl
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lolar v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00269
Petitioner:
Marcus E Lolar
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Savage v. Tulsa County Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Marquice Donnell Savage
Defendant:
Tulsa County Sheriffs Office, Vic Rigilado, Dobbertin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
Marquilion Hogan
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Board of County Comm'rs of Tulsa County, Ashley Nix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00171
Petitioner:
Darvin W. Gray
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cisneros v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv00430
Petitioner:
Michael V Cisneros
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
