Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Hill v. Government for the State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv10569
Plaintiff:
Eric Rodney Hill
Defendant:
Government for the State of West Virginia and F.C.I. Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Connecticut et al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00802
Defendant:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC, Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
State of New Mexico, State of Missouri, State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Clervrain v. Cissna et al
as 1:2020cv02197
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of California, United States Department Office of the Labor, United Nations (U.N.) and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00710
Plaintiff:
State of North Dakota, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant:
Actavis Pharma, Inc., Richard Rogerson, Nisha Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Arkansas et al v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01180
Plaintiff:
State of Arkansas , District of Columbia , State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Citron Pharma, LLC, Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Shew v. Malloy
as 14-319
Amicus Curiae:
Douglas Hall, Law Enforcement Action Network, State of Maryland and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Reuben F. Bradford, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, Dannel P. Malloy, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Connecticut, Maureen Platt, in her official capacity as State's Attorney for the Waterbury Judicial District, Geographical Area No. 4 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stephanie Cypher, Rabbi Mitchell Rocklin, June Shew and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Holly
New York State Rifle and Pisto v. Cuomo
as 14-37
Defendant:
Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney for Erie County, Gerald J. Gill, Chief of Police for the Town of Lancaster, New York and Lawrence Friedman
Amicus Curiae:
State of Kentucky, Law Enforcement Action Network, Empire State Arms Collectors Association, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
William Nojay, Blueline Tactical & Police Supply, LLC, Sportsmen's Association for Firearms Education, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., John Amidon, Reuel A. Todd, Oswego County Sheriff and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York, Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York and Joseph A. D'Amico, Superintendent of the New York State Police
New York State Rifle and Pisto v. Cuomo
as 14-36
Amicus Curiae:
John Amidon, State of Delaware, State of Kentucky and others
Defendant:
Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney for Erie County
Defendant / Appellee:
Gerald J. Gill, Chief of Police for the Town of Lancaster, New York, Lawrence Friedman, Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sportsmen's Association for Firearms Education, Inc., Batavia Marine & Sporting Supply, Thomas Galvin and others
Petitioner:
Donald B. Smith, Putnam County Sheriff, Timothy B. Howard, Erie County Sheriff, Barry C. Virts, Wayne County Sheriff and others
State of Texas v. Penguin Group (USA) Inc.
as 14-61
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Connecticut, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Penguin Group (USA) Inc., Simon & Schuster, Inc., Simon & Schuster Digital Sales, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Apple Inc.
In Re: Electronic Books Antitr
as 13-4828
Plaintiff - Appellee:
The State of Arizona, The State of Alaska, The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Simon & Schuster Digital Sales, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
MacMillian, Inc, Random House Inc., Hachette Book Group and others
Objector - Appellant:
Bob Kohn
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
