Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 68
McGhee v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-2460
Plaintiff: JOSEPH MARTIN MCGHEE
Defendant: STATE OF ARIZONA, a sovereign State of the United States of America, RYAN FORSMAN, as an individual and in his official capacity as police officer employed by the City of Flagstaff, DARA RABIN, as a private party state actor and others
Farag v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02728
Plaintiff: Tarek Farag
Defendant: Joseph Biden, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant: BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff: JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee: MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Motley v. Janae Rocquel Motley Estate
as 24-1
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY
Defendant / Appellee: JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY ESTATE, beneficiary JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY, DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS, DERRION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DERRION RASHAD BROOKS and others
PANFEROV v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv03249
Plaintiff: ALEXEY PANFEROV
Defendant: ANTONY J. BLINKEN, DEPARTMENT OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JIM MULLINAX and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
USA v. Philip Morris USA Inc., et al
as 23-5203
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America, United States Department of Justice
Not Yet Classified: American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association and others
Defendant / Appellant: Philip Morris USA Inc., formerly known as Philip Morris Incorporated
Defendant / Appellee: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Directly and as successor by merger to American Tobacco Company, Lorillard Tobacco Company and others
Intervenor / Appellee: Smithkline Beecham Corp., doing business as GlaxoSmithKline, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, L.P., Pharmacia Corporation and others
Bennett et al v. The United States Of America, et al
as 3:2023cv01140
Plaintiff: Pamela Bennett and James Bennett
Defendant: The United States Of America (United States Federal Bureau Of Investigation- as one of the agencies of the United States), Michael Garland, Cynthia A. Freeland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Gulf Express v. United States of America, United States Department of Agriculture We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00134
Plaintiff: Gulf Express
Defendant: United States of America, United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Cox v. Department of Justice
as 22-1202
Plaintiff / Appellant: Douglas Cox
Defendant / Appellee: Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Defense and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?