Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. v. Steffany
as 3:2020cv00924
Plaintiff:
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Paul A. Steffany
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. v. Steffany
as 3:2020mc00049
Plaintiff:
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Paul A. Steffany
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. v. Steffany
as 3:2020mc00050
Plaintiff:
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Paul A. Steffany
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. v. Steffany
as 3:2020cv00923
Plaintiff:
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Paul A. Steffany
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. v. Steffany
as 3:2020mc00051
Plaintiff:
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Paul A. Steffany
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01155
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dennis v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03083
Plaintiff:
Steffanie Michelle Dennis
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Oy and Bayer Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guichardo et al v. Langston Hughes Queens Library et al
as 1:2015cv02866
Defendant:
Andrew P. Jackson, John Does (1-10) Jane Does (1-10), Central Queens Library, Corona Queens Library, John Does (1-10) Jane Does (1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
Carmen C. Guichardo, Elijah J. Guichardo and Carmen R. Yentes Puesan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen, et al v. City of New York, et al
as 1:2003cv02829
Plaintiff:
Adrianne "Ace" Allen, Glenn Brightwell, Ryan Calabrese and others
Petitioner:
National Lawyers Guild, NYC Chapter
Defendant:
City of New York, NYPO Inspector Thomas Lawrence, NYCPO Vanessa Bragg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
