Cases 1 - 10 of 887
Stephens v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv11380
Plaintiff:
Erin Stephens
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Woods v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11353
Plaintiff:
Stephen Woods
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Druhan v. Hoge et al
as 1:2024cv11309
Plaintiff:
Robert Druhan
Defendant:
Stephen Hoge, Noubar Afeyan and Stephane Bancel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Beatty v. Kennedy
as 1:2024cv11284
Petitioner:
Joseph W Beatty
Respondent:
Stephen Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Opalenik v. City of Northampton et al
as 3:2024cv30068
Plaintiff:
Stephen Opalenik, Jr
Defendant:
City of Northampton, Northampton Police Department, Gina-Louise Sciarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donnelly v. Town of Scituate et al
as 1:2024cv11046
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Donnelly
Defendant:
Town of Scituate, Maura C. Curran, Andrew W Goodrich and others
Interested Party:
Town of Cohasset
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aguiar v. Bowers
as 1:2024cv10987
Petitioner:
Stephen Aguiar
Respondent:
Fred Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Degree v. Gendreau et al
as 1:2024cv10686
Plaintiff:
Tina Degree
Defendant:
Stephen Gendreau, James Fay, Donald G Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
