Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stephen Hause v. Dr. Mile
as 14-6375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN MARK HAUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. MILES, LCDC Physician, MAJOR JONES, LCDC Supt, THE LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, in their individual and/or official capacities and others
Stephen Hause v. Dr. Mile
as 14-6373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN MARK HAUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. MILES, LCDC Physician, MAJOR JONES, LCDC Supt, THE LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, in their individual and/or official capacities and others
Stephen Hause v. Dr. Mile
as 14-6240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN MARK HAUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. MILES, LCDC Physician, MAJOR JONES, LCDC Supt, THE LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, in their individual and/or official capacities and others
Hause v. Jones
as 9:2014cv00275
Petitioner:
Stephen Mark Hause
Respondent:
Major Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stephen Hause v. Dr. Mile
as 14-6035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN MARK HAUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. MILES, LCDC Physician, MAJOR JONES, LCDC Supt, THE LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, In their individual and/or official capacities and others
Stephen Hause v. Dayne Phillip
as 14-6036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN MARK HAUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAYNE PHILLIPS, Assistant Public Defender, in his Individual and Official Capacities on behalf of the Lexington County Public Defender's Office
Hause v. Bastian et al
as 9:2013cv03531
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mark Hause
Defendant:
C/O Bastian, Hoorah Guard, Sgt Felders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hause v. Phillips
as 3:2013cv02743
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mark Hause
Defendant:
Dayne Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hause v. Miles et al
as 9:2013cv01271
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mark Hause
Defendant:
Dr Miles, Major Jones, Lexington County Detention Center, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
