Cases 1 - 10 of 16
SHEA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17133
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN SHEA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shea v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
as 8:2020cv01935
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
Plaintiff:
Stephen Shea
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
SHEA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv01959
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN STEPHEN SHEA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv10376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ivanti et al v. Shea
as 2:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Ivanti and Landesk Software Singapore Pte
Defendant:
Stephen Shea
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Maria Loberg et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2016cv06190
Defendant:
Lee Sheriff Baca, County of Los Angeles, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Erica Loberg and Maria Loberg
Stephen Shea v. Cellco Partnership, et al
as 15-7135
:
United States of America, ex rel. Stephen Shea
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stephen M. Shea
Defendant - Appellee:
Cellco Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless, Verizon Business Network Services, Inc., Verizon Federal Inc. and others
Stephen Shea, et al v. Cellco Partnership, et al
as 15-7136
:
United States of America, ex rel. Stephen Shea
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Stephen M. Shea
Defendant - Appellant:
Cellco Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless, Verizon Business Network Services, Inc., Verizon Federal Inc. and others
Shea et al v. Walgreen Co
as 6:2014cv03759
Plaintiff:
Stephen Shea and Elmer Doney
Defendant:
Walgreen Co
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Phyllis Losorelli et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05062
Defendant:
Lee Baca, Bonnie Baker, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Losorelli and Phyllis Losorelli
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
