Cases 91 - 100 of 206
Suess v. US Bankruptcy Court Clerk for the City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2019cv05716
Plaintiff:
Blake Suess
Defendant:
Stephen Sinclair, Stone, US Bankruptcy Court Clerk for the City of Tacoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barstad v. Washington Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv05195
Plaintiff:
James-Benjamin Barstad
Defendant:
Robert Herzog, John C Dittman, Stephen Sinclair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linear v. Sinclair et al
as 3:2019cv05665
Defendant:
Deborah J Wofford, Stephen Sinclair, D Hollibaugh and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A Linear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allah v. Mertel et al
as 2:2019cv01065
Plaintiff:
Allah, NFN, Natural Person and others
Defendant:
Stephen Sinclair, Donald R Holbrook, Paul L Sherfey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allah v. Holbrook et al
as 4:2019cv05178
Defendant:
Donald R Holbrook, Stephen Sinclair, Paul L Sherfey and others
Plaintiff:
NFN Allah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allah v. Sinclair et al
as 2:2019cv00902
Petitioner:
Allah, SP and NOI
Respondent:
Donald R Holbrook and Stephen Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson et al v. US Bankruptcy Court Clerk for the City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2019cv05475
Plaintiff:
Kyntrel Jackson, Blake Suess, Bert Holmes and others
Defendant:
S Lohneis, Stone, US Bankruptcy Court Clerk for the City of Tacoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. Sinclair et al
as 3:2019cv05440
Defendant:
State of Washington, Stephen Sinclair, Clark County and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allah v. Sinclair et al
as 4:2019cv05131
Respondent:
Secretary of DOC, Donald R Holbrook, Stephen Sinclair and others
Petitioner:
Allah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Allah v. Sinclair et al
as 2:2019cv00735
Petitioner:
Allah and SP
Respondent:
Donald R Holbrook and Stephen Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
