Cases 1 - 10 of 310
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sterling Jr. v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00154
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Phillip-Jay Sterling Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoard v. Texas Attorney General
as 3:2024cv01369
Defendant:
Tam Terry, Texas Attorney General, Carson County Commissioners Court and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Hoard, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sterling Computers Corporation v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00551
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sterling Computers Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Sterling Computers Corporation v. X Corp.
as 1:2024cv00552
Defendant:
X Corp.
Plaintiff:
Sterling Computers Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Evans v. Aponte et al
as 1:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Reginald Evans
Defendant:
Sterling Hickerson, Jr., Operation Mgr. Linda I. Aponte, Green Dot Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00498
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Sterling Computers Corporation v. Microsoft Corporation
as 1:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Sterling Computers Corporation
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Hammons v. Tradeline Motorcars et al
as 3:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Demetria-Sharel Hammons
Defendant:
Tradeline Motorcars, Strategic Dealer Services and Sterling Credit Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
