Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Knight v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv00033
Defendant:
B. Newman, P. Lawrence, Steve Bullock and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ibsen v. Diaz et al
as 6:2021cv00001
Defendant:
Department of Labor, Ana Diaz, Steve Bullock and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Ibsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Bullock v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Steve Bullock
Amicus Curiae:
Ron Wyden, Thomas R. Carper, Tammy Duckworth and others
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Holmes v. Bullock et al
as 6:2020cv00027
Plaintiff:
Raymond Arlen Holmes
Defendant:
Jay Easley, Steve Bullock and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrus v. Bullock et al
as 9:2020cv00017
Defendant:
Steve Bullock, State of Montana, Dr. Virginia Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Mortier Barrus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tummarello v. State of Montana Department of Health and Human Services Child Support Enforcement Division et al
as 9:2019cv00183
Defendant:
Suszanne Habbe, Richard Opper, Melissa Darko and others
Plaintiff:
Philip John Tummarello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Maier v. Fody et al
as 6:2019cv00076
Defendant:
Alvin Fody, Bill Miller, Steve Bullock and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Scott Maier
In Re:
Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braulick v. Bullock et al
as 6:2019cv00070
Defendant:
Paul Rees, Eric Thomas, Steve Bullock and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy John Braulick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Illinois Opportunity Project v. Bullock et al
as 6:2019cv00056
Plaintiff:
Illinois Opportunity Project
Defendant:
Meghan Holmlund and Steve Bullock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Bullock et al
as 6:2019cv00053
Plaintiff:
Britt Long
Defendant:
Steve Bullock and Timothy Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
