Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Ivey et al v. Grubbs et al
as 1:2022cv04836
Plaintiff:
Marvis McDaniel Ivey and Marcus D. Ivey
Defendant:
Adele P. Grubbs, David Emerson, Catherine M. Salinas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GLESSNER v. SMITH et al
as 5:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
ROBIN GLESSNER
Defendant:
JONATHAN D SMITH, STEVE C DAVIS INC, PROTECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Williams v. Baxter et al
as 1:2021cv02099
Defendant:
LeeTra Harris, State of Georgia, Shauna S. Tucker and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Jones et al
as 1:2020cv04163
Defendant:
Steve C. Jones and Linda T. Walker
Plaintiff:
Randall Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv04101
Defendant:
Harold L. Murphy, William Foster, III, Janet King and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Liberty County, Georgia et al
as 4:2018cv00216
Defendant:
Deputy M. Gary Richardson, Liberty County, Georgia, Liberty County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
B.E.J. III, Elvira Lowman and Bernard E. Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBBLE v. Jones et al
as 4:2016cv00362
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
STEVE C JONES and CLAY D LAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowens v. Sikes et al
as 4:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
Rosevelt Bowens
Defendant:
Steve C. Sikes, Jeff Hein, Lisa Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oglesby v. Nobels et al
as 5:2014cv00098
Petitioner:
Jerry Rollins Oglesby
Respondent:
Greg Nobels, Steve C. Sikes and Randy F. Royal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
