Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Littlefield v. Strange et al
as 2:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tyler Littlefield
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Michelle Duncan, Jason Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Grey et al
as 2:2021cv00095
Defendant:
Laurance Harrod, Michael Wright, Douglas McLane and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jay Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emuveyan v. Ewing et al
as 2:2019cv00616
Defendant:
Clyde Companies, Geneva Rock Products, Inc. and Steve Ewing
Plaintiff:
Oghenetega Emuveyan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Denton v. Rainer et al
as 3:2019cv05743
Defendant:
Steven Jewitt, Lisa Anderson, Jack Warner and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Denton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabriel Eckard v. Asen Deshev, et al
as 19-35522
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GABRIEL ECKARD, AKA Gabriel Allen Eckard
Defendant / Appellee:
ASEN DESHEV, Mental Health Custody Unit Supervisor, Monroe Correctional Complex, STEVE EWING, Correctional Officer, Monroe Correctional Complex, BREEANN CARAWAY, Correctional Officer, Monroe Correctional Complex and others
Demos v. Oberland et al
as 2:2018cv01764
Defendant:
Robert Herzog, Jeffrey Flick, Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrin LaPine v. Robert Savoie, et al
as 16-1893
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRIN LAPINE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT SAVOIE, Sheriff, MICHAEL BITNAR, Undersheriff, JOHN HORKE, Tether Agent and others
LaPine #305535 v. Savoie et al
as 2:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
Darrin LaPine #305535
Defendant:
Robert Savoie, Michael Bitner, John Horke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv00675
Plaintiff:
Johnie Russell Williams, III
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Tyler Muise, Ric Rosales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
