Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mullings v. Burnett
as 24-2178
Defendant:
S. THOMPSON, Correctional Officer, Fishkill Correctional Facility, in their individual capacity, Darren Thomas, GAETAN ZAMILUS, MD, Fishkill Correctional Facility, in their individual capacity and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MULLINGS
David v. Wasatch County Utah et al
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Lynn David
Defendant:
Wasatch County, Utah, Mark Nelson, Spencer Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David v. Wasatch County, UT et al
as 2:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Lynn David
Defendant:
Wasatch County, UT, Mark Nelson, Spencer Park and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
FARRELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16089
Plaintiff:
STEVE FARRELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.017 ACRES IN EAST CALN TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2013cv06109
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 0.222 ACRES IN EAST CALN TOWNSHIP, STEVE FARRELL, LYNDA K. FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.018 ACRES AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.017 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST CALN TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 40-01-0006 et al
as 2:2009cv01385
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.018 ACRES AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.017 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST CALN TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 40-01-0006, FRIGYES ALEJNIKOV, MARIA ALEJNIKOV and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
