Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Harrington v. Covello
as 3:2019cv01824
Petitioner:
Steve Harrington
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abarca et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2018cv00947
Plaintiff:
Eunice Gomez, Jean L. Davis, Monica Arce and others
Defendant:
Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Harrington v. Kottemann
as 3:2017cv03290
Plaintiff:
Steve Harrington
Defendant:
. Kottemann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrington v. Paramo
as 3:2015cv02116
Petitioner:
Steve Harrington
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steve Harrington v. George Neotti
as 12-56931
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVE HARRINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE A. NEOTTI, Warden
Arata et al v. BP America Production Company et al
as 2:2011cv02530
Plaintiff:
John Arata , Southern Sports Fishing, Inc. , Larry Scott and others
Defendant:
BP America Production Company , Parsons Corporation , Danos & Curole Staffing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1333
Harrington v. Neotti
as 3:2011cv02016
Petitioner:
Steve Harrington
Respondent:
George A Neotti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harrington v. Neotti
as 3:2011cv02015
Petitioner:
Steve Harrington
Respondent:
George A Neotti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arata et al v. BP America Production Company et al
as 1:2011cv00274
Defendant:
BP America Production Company , Parsons Corporation , Dennis Berg and others
Plaintiff:
John Arata , Southern Sports Fishing, Inc. , Larry Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
HALL et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2008cv04136
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE HALL, RORY HILL, JOHN DENNY and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
