Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv04305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
FARVARDIN v. SROMOVSKY et al
as 2:2012cv06680
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED FARVARDIN
Defendant:
JOHN SROMOVSKY, MICHAEL SANTOS, STEVEN B. RANCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CORTNER et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv37818
Plaintiff:
STEVEN B. CORTNER and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
WACHOVIA FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. v. ATLASS
as 2:2009cv06118
Plaintiff:
WACHOVIA FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
STEVEN B. ATLASS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Wilkinson v. USA
as 1:2010cv00078
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Steven B. Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SWOPE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2009cv01320
Plaintiff:
STEVEN B. SWOPE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Social Security (RSI)
STEVEN B. GOLDEN ASSOCIATES, INC. v. ROYAL CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC
as 5:2009cv03890
Plaintiff:
STEVEN B. GOLDEN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
ROYAL CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
GROVER v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00551
Plaintiff:
STEVEN B. GROVER
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and BANK OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
I & I SLING, INC. et al v. ROBERTS TESTING EQUIPMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv01988
Plaintiff:
I & I SLING, INC. and SLINGMAX, INC.
Defendant:
ROBERTS TESTING EQUIPMENT, INC., JOSEPH E. ROBERTS and STEVEN B. GUYDOS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
