Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Hedlund v. Mulheim et al
as 3:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ronald Hedlund and Ronald Hedlund
Defendant:
Matthew Mulheim, Clarke Mercer, Sandra Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
George Hengle v. Sherry Treppa
as 20-1359
Defendant / Appellant:
SHERRY TREPPA, Chairperson of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Counsil; in her official capacity, AIMEE JACKSON-PENN, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, KATHLEEN TREPPA, Treasurer of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUE COLLINS, LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, TIFFANI MYERS and others
Defendant:
SCOTT ASNER and JOSHUA LANDY
George Hengle v. Scott Asner
as 20-1358
Defendant:
AMBER JACKSON, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, KATHLEEN TREPPA, Treasurer of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, TRACEY TREPPA, Vice-Chairperson of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUE COLLINS, LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, TIFFANI MYERS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSHUA LANDY and SCOTT ASNER
Sherry Treppa v. George Hengle
as 20-164
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, WILLIE ROSE, STEVEN PIKE and others
Petitioner:
AIMEE JACKSON-PENN, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, SHERRY TREPPA, Chairperson of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Counsil; in her official capacity, AMBER JACKSON, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity and others
Scott Asner v. George Hengle
as 20-161
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, WILLIE ROSE, STEVEN PIKE and others
Petitioner:
JOSHUA LANDY and SCOTT ASNER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
George Hengle v. Scott Asner
as 20-1063
Defendant:
AMBER JACKSON, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, KATHLEEN TREPPA, Treasurer of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, TRACEY TREPPA, Vice-Chairperson of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUE COLLINS, LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, TIFFANI MYERS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSHUA LANDY and SCOTT ASNER
George Hengle v. Sherry Treppa
as 20-1062
Defendant / Appellant:
SHERRY TREPPA, Chairperson of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Counsil; in her official capacity, AIMEE JACKSON-PENN, Member-At-Large of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity, KATHLEEN TREPPA, Treasurer of the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Executive Council; in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUE COLLINS, LAWRENCE MWETHUKU, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, TIFFANI MYERS and others
Defendant:
SCOTT ASNER and JOSHUA LANDY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Castro et al v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv00586
Plaintiff:
Herbert White, Hamdi Eslaquit, Richy Castro and others
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A., Capital One Financial Corporation and Capital One Bank (USA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
