Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wood v. Gibson
as 4:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Wood
Defendant:
James Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. Mississippi County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Casey
Defendant:
Mississippi County Sheriff Department, Matt McClain, Steve Raymonld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. Blytheville Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Casey
Defendant:
Blytheville Police Department and Mississippi County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Sweet et al
as 4:2022cv00496
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Wood
Defendant:
Rowdy Sweet, Aaron Swatzal and Shane Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv05112
Defendant:
Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC, John Does 1-5 and Steven Ray Devoss
Plaintiff:
Kyle Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hemphill v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2019cv00741
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Hemphill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ludlam v. Hobbs
as 5:2010cv00277
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Ludlam
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Talbot v. Benton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2009cv05191
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Talbot
Defendant:
Benton County Sheriff's Office, Huskins and Robert Holly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven R. Jones v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2009cv05005
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Jones
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ludlam v. Parker et al
as 5:2008cv00341
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Ludlam
Defendant:
David Parker, Wayne Edwards, Mathew Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
