Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Stiles v. Ariens Company
as 2:2023cv02586
Plaintiff:
Eunice Faye Stiles
Defendant:
Ariens Company
Not Classified By Court:
Ed Pulliam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perry v. Jenkins & Stiles, LLC
as 3:2021cv00414
Plaintiff:
Alberta McKinney and Alberta Louise Perry
Defendant:
Jenkins & Stiles, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Lee et al
as 2:2019cv00017
Defendant:
Glenn Edward Lee, Karan Stiles and Doris M. Lee
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallace v. Lee et al
as 2:2017cv00159
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wallace
Defendant:
Randy Lee, Hampton, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers v. Robertson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
Christopher Vickers
Defendant:
Robertson County, Tennessee, Bill Holt, J. Stiles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stiles v. Brandon Scott Abernathy
as 3:2015cv01132
Plaintiff:
Norman K. Stiles
Defendant:
Brandon Scott Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stiles v. Erickson et al
as 2:2015cv02553
Plaintiff:
Dorinda J Stiles
Defendant:
John D. Erickson and Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Stiles et al v. Ion Hazapariu, et al
as 2:2014cv00273
Plaintiff:
M N S and Jordan Clark Stiles
Defendant:
Ion Hazapariu, Yes Express Inc. and Hello Express Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawson v. Yes Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lawson and Jordan Clark Stiles
Defendant:
Yes Express, Inc., Ion Hazapariu and Hello Express Inc.
Interested Party:
Jennifer O'Connell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stiles v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Chad Eugene Stiles
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
