Cases 41 - 50 of 383
WATERMAN v. AT HOME GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02956
Defendant:
LARRY D STONE, KENNETH SIMRIL, LEWIS L BIRD III and others
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
SHELDON v. STONE et al
as 2:2021cv00626
Defendant:
JOSHUA STONE and BACA TRANSPORT, LLC
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SHELDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
STONE v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01087
Defendant:
"XYZ CORP", MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., "JANE DOE" and others
Plaintiff:
JESSIE STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stone v. Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Delaware Valley, Inc. d/b/a Clarifi et al
as 2:2021cv00359
Defendant:
GREENPATH and Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Delaware Valley, Inc. d/b/a Clarifi
Plaintiff:
Marnet Stone
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Stone Bey v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2021cv00113
Defendant:
U.S. House of Representatives, Warden Scott Finley, Judge Gerald J. Poppert and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Stone Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STONE et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00236
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP, MCKESSON CORPORATION and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
JEFF P. STONE and JANE STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACUITY v. STONE HAVEN SERVICES, LLC
as 5:2020cv06414
Defendant:
STONE HAVEN SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
ACUITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ACUITY, A MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. STONE HAVEN SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2020cv06414
Plaintiff:
ACUITY, A MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
STONE HAVEN SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
STONE v. UHS OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.
as 2:2020cv06148
Defendant:
UHS OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. doing business as The Horsham Clinic
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA STONE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
