Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Stovall v. Warden of SCI-Muncy et al
as 2:2024cv01839
Petitioner: ARCELIA TRUMAINE STOVALL
Respondent: Warden of SCI-Muncy and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stovall v. Warden of SCI-Muncy et al
as 1:2024cv00343
Petitioner: Arcelia Trumaine Stovall
Respondent: Warden of SCI-Muncy and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLARK v. KALTESKI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00081
Plaintiff: SHELBY TYRONE CLARK and SHELBY TYRONE CLARK, JR.
Defendant: KENNETH KALTESKI, EMIL SOFIA, LILLIAN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOVALL
as 2:2020cv05143
In Re: ARCELIA TRUMAINE STOVALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOVALL v. SLAUGHTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01709
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and JAMES SLAUGHTER
Petitioner: WILLIAM STOVALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STOVALL v. KALLENBACH We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00083
Plaintiff: DANIEL L STOVALL
Defendant: KEVIN KALLENBACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOVALL v. LAWLER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00241
Petitioner: DAMON LYNN STOVALL
Respondent: RAYMOND LAWLER and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stovall v. Lawler
as 4:2008cv01536
Petitioner: Damon Lynn Stovall
Respondent: Raymond Lawler and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STOVALL v. HAYMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv03062
Plaintiff: WILLIAM STOVALL
Defendant: GEORGE HAYMAN, MICHELLE R. RICCI, DONALD MEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?