Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Stovall et al v. Bradley et al
as 2:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
Stavon Stovall , Marquisa Turner , A.S. and others
Defendant:
John Oliver Bradley and Coach Ride, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Binion et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al (MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00657
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Binion, John A Wright, Bernice Atchison and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture and Tom Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stovall v. Underwood et al
as 6:2016cv00633
Petitioner:
Adam Stovall
Respondent:
Jim Underwood and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stovall v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Stovall
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections, Jefferson S. Dunn, Cassandra Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liberty Insurance Corporation v. LPP Mortgage, Ltd. et al
as 6:2014cv02303
Plaintiff:
Liberty Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
LPP Mortgage, Ltd. , MGC Mortgage, Inc. , Cenlar FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Montpelier US Insurance Co v. Hubbard et al
as 1:2013cv01956
Plaintiff:
Montpelier US Insurance Co
Defendant:
Charlotte Hubbard and Crystall/Stovall Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stovall v. Boyd et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv01035
Plaintiff:
Maurice Cartez Stovall
Defendant:
Louis Boyd and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
