Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Moler v. Stovall et al
as 6:2019cv00206
Respondent:
Rachel Johnson, Ns. Parsons-Gould, Tara Cimarossa and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Moler v. Mabe et al
as 6:2019cv00203
Petitioner:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Respondent:
Jason Sickler, Christopher Mabe, C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moler v. Lawson et al
as 6:2019cv00204
Respondent:
Unknown Named "Contract-Medical", Mitchell Dyer, S. Lynch and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Moler v. Lawson et al
as 6:2019cv00149
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Christopher Mabe, Ms. J. Free and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stovall v. Helton
as 5:2017cv00448
Petitioner:
Daniel Stovall
Respondent:
Keith Helton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stovall v. Thompson et al
as 3:2015cv00082
Petitioner:
Daniel Stovall
Respondent:
LaDonna Thompson, Mr. White, Jennifer Whalen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mathis v. Caraway et al
as 6:2015cv00181
Plaintiff:
Eric Devon Mathis
Defendant:
J.F. Caraway, Matthew W. Melladay, J.C. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witcher et al v. Federal-Mogul Products, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
Steve Witcher , Sheila Witcher , Cody Witcher and others
Defendant:
Federal-Mogul Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bank of America, N.A. v. Nicholasville, KY City of et al
as 5:2014cv00078
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
Nicholasville, KY City of , JAH Nicholasville Investment #2, LLC, L-M Asphalt Partners, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bank of America, NA v. JAH Nicholasville Road #3, LLC et al
as 5:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
JAH Nicholasville Road #3, LLC , Garrett Stovall, James A. Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
