Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Urrutia-Rivero v. Addison Subway, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02589
Plaintiff: Ana Urrutia-Rivero
Defendant: Addison Subway, Inc. and Mohammad Iqbal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07139
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HOGGARD v. DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00999
Defendant: DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, INC., FRANCHISE WORLD HEADQUARTERS LLC, SUBWAY REAL ESTATE CORP. and others
Plaintiff: ANITA A. HOGGARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Pendrak et al v. Subway Sandwich Shops Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00657
Plaintiff: Charles Noah Pendrak and John Farley
Defendant: Subway Sandwich Shops Inc and Doctor's Associates Inc
Roseman v. Subway Sandwich Shops Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00658
Plaintiff: Andrew Roseman
Defendant: Subway Sandwich Shops Inc and Doctor's Associates Inc
In Re: Subway Footlong Sandwich Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 2:2013md02439
Plaintiff: Nguyen Buren , Jason Leslie , Richard Springer and others
Defendant: Doctor's Associates Inc , Subway Sandwich Shops Inc , John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01179
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
SUBWAY: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00607
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1462
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Barner v. Subway
as 1:2010cv07962
Plaintiff: Barbara A Barner
Defendant: Subway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?