Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Odell et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Odell, G. Doe, J. Doe and others
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Jim Hivner, Sara Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 3:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Kara Pratt, Texas Supreme Court, Texas Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Hicks v. 6th District Supreme Court of United States Memphis, TN
as 2:2022cv02693
Petitioner:
Kenneth Hicks
Respondent:
6th District Supreme Court of United States Memphis, TN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Reynolds-Bey v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv00890
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Reynolds-Bey
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Tennessee, United States Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Creasy v. Gay et al
as 3:2021cv00714
Plaintiff:
William G. Creasy
Defendant:
Dee David Gay, Lawrence Ray Whitely, Lytle A. Jame and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00274
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxey v. Barrett et al
as 2:2021cv00030
Plaintiff:
James C Maxey
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100, Amy Coney Barrett, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weatherspoon v. U.S. Supreme Court
as 2:2020cv02915
Petitioner:
Adrian Weatherspoon
Respondent:
U.S. Supreme Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
