Cases 1 - 10 of 73
WILLIAMS et al v. RUTALA et al
as 2:2024cv02132
Plaintiff:
OSCEOLA WILLIAMS, SUSIE CARTER and OSCEOLA PERDUE
Defendant:
JOSEPH RUTALA, MARK S. HALPERN and DELAWARE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
OLIVER v. ARAMARK FOOD INC. et al
as 5:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
BRIAN C. OLIVER
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD INC., ARAMARK SUPERVISOR TASSONE, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLUNT v. BJ'S WHOLEALE CLUB, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03982
Plaintiff:
ROCHELLE BLUNT
Defendant:
BJ'S WHOLEALE CLUB, INC., MORMAX CORPORATION, SUSIE HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BLUNT v. BJ'S WHOLEALE CLUB, INC. et al
as 5:2021cv03982
Plaintiff:
ROCHELLE BLUNT
Defendant:
BJ'S WHOLEALE CLUB, INC., MORMAX CORPORATION, SUSIE HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GRIMES v. THACKRAY CRANE RENTALS, INC.
as 2:2018cv03020
Defendant:
THACKRAY CRANE RENTALS, INC.
Plaintiff:
SUSIE GRIMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CHESTER v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 5:2014cv06030
Plaintiff:
SUSIE CHESTER
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON , SECANT MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAHAM v. ROSENBLUM et al
as 2:2014cv03390
Plaintiff:
RONALD GRAHAM
Defendant:
DAVID ROSENBLUM, SUSIE ROSENBLUM, D&F CLOTHING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BISHOP et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2014cv03002
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BISHOP , ETHAN JOHNSON , CHRIS DUGAN and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
