Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Crawford v. Swanson
as 4:2024cv04073
Plaintiff:
Kevin Crawford
Defendant:
Claudia Swanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Knode v. Fredrikson et al
as 4:2023cv04171
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dwight Knode
Defendant:
Tracy Fredrikson, Doug Clark, Mark Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Loseth et al
as 5:2023cv05059
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Chad Loseth, Valkyrie Construction, LLC, Dave Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Swanson et al v. Hy-Vee, Inc.
as 4:2022cv04180
Plaintiff:
LuAnn Swanson and Ron Swanson
Defendant:
Hy-Vee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Newman v. Fluke et al
as 4:2022cv04158
Petitioner:
Charles Westley Newman
Respondent:
Brent Fluke, Gordon Swanson, Myron Rau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newman v. Gilchrist et al
as 4:2022cv04155
Plaintiff:
Charles Newman
Defendant:
Tom Gilchrist, Brenna Carlson, Brent Fluke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Rasmussen v. Swanson
as 3:2022cv03016
Plaintiff:
Janet Lee Rasmussen
Defendant:
Charles Greg Swanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Harcey v. South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 4:2021cv04071
Defendant:
Myron Rau, Kenneth Albers, Chuck Schroyer and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Harcey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toof v. Swanson
as 5:2021cv05018
Defendant:
Amanda Swanson and Pennington County
Plaintiff:
Darwin Nathaniel Toof
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toof v. Swanson et al
as 5:2021cv05009
Defendant:
Amanda Swanson, Kevin Thom, County of Pennington and others
Plaintiff:
Darwin Nathaniel Toof
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
